← edossier.tech eDossier · design prototype v0.1 SAMPLE DATA — fictional entities, no real persons
e eDossier RESEARCH DESK
N. Tran editor · publisher

Research Inbox

Agent submissions awaiting human review

Research batch RB-2026-0114 unreviewed schema 0.3

Which public filings establish who controlled Periphery Gaming after the 2019 restructuring?

Submitted by
work:research-01
Submitted
2026-10-12 21:40
Dossier
ED-P-014
Idempotency key
pgy-restructure-001
Payload hash
9f2c…41ab
Status
staged · awaiting review
SRC

Source proposals & lineage

4 sources · 1 root
SRC-P-0912 primary · registry extract p.3 item 4 retrieved
└─ SRC-P-0913 republishes §2.1 retrieved
└─ SRC-P-0914 quotes para 6 retrieved
└─ SRC-P-0915 translates (zh→en) post body retrieved
1 root lineage from 4 sources — not independent corroboration independence not assessed
CLM

Claim proposals

accept = entry into knowledge base, not verified, not published
RCP-0442 ●fact owns(org, equity) · proposed undecided

Dahlia Holdings Ltd held a 100% equity interest in Periphery Gaming Pte Ltd as of 30 June 2019, per the company registry extract.

Attribution SRC-P-0912 · corporate registry (primary) · zh Evidence supports SRC-P-0912 p.3 item 4 · A2 Relevance passed — ownership & control, core project scope Valid time 2019-06-30 → (open) Lineage 1 root · duplicate registry republish excluded Entity no canonical match — queued for entity resolution, never auto-created from a name
RCP-0443 ▲reported appoints(org, person) · proposed undecided

A trade publication reported in March 2021 that a former staff member said operational control of the team had moved to a new management company before the filing was updated.

Attribution SRC-P-0914 · trade press quoting an unnamed former staff member — attributed to the publication, not the speaker Evidence supports SRC-P-0914 para 6 · C6 Also contradicts SRC-P-0913 §2.1 — filing states no change of control Relevance passed — control & governance Assessor note Supports that the statement was published. Does not establish that control moved. Quoted person is unattributed → cannot support more than a reported claim.
RCP-0444 ◇assessment analytic · confidence proposed: low undecided

The 2019 restructuring most likely transferred operational control to Dahlia's management arm while economic ownership stayed with the founding shareholders.

Rationale Registry shows equity unchanged; management-agreement scope is referenced but not disclosed; three of four sources share one root. Alternatives H1 equity transfer not yet filed · H2 management agreement is advisory only · H3 publication error Limits No access to the management agreement itself; no interviews. Relevance passed — control & governance Constraint may not cite RCP-0443 as fact; renders only with its limits
GATE

Excluded on relevance

RCP-0446 ⊘excluded excluded before storage
Category private-life — no documented linkage to governance, spending or appointments Retained category + reason only · statement, excerpts and attachments purged from staging
0 accept · 0 needs research · 0 reject
Accepting is not verification and does not publish. Commit writes append-only canonical claims with reviewer, timestamp and rationale.
ED-P-014 r7 · as of 2026-10-23 DRAFT — unpublished autosaved 11:04

Periphery Gaming: ownership, control and the 2019 restructuring

Who held economic interest, who held operational control, and what the public filings actually establish.

heading

01Executive intelligence brief

para

Periphery Gaming is a competitive team and management company that has changed control structure at least once since 2019. This dossier separates three questions that public commentary usually merges: who holds equity, who votes it, and who signs operating decisions.

claim
●fact CLM-1088 supported

Dahlia Holdings Ltd held a 100% equity interest in Periphery Gaming Pte Ltd as of 30 June 2019.

SRC-P-0912 · p.3 item 4A2·1 root lineage
parallel

Between 2019 and 2021 the registry entry for the operating entity was amended twice; neither amendment changed the shareholder line. What changed was the named management company under a services agreement whose scope is not public.

claim
▲reported CLM-1091 unverified

A trade publication reported that a former staff member said operational control had moved to a new management company before the filing was updated.

SRC-P-0914 · para 6C6·1 contradiction on record
callout
Open question

The services agreement between Dahlia's management arm and the operating entity has not been retrieved. Until it is, operational control remains an assessment, not a fact.

heading

02Identity & background

para

Two legal entities carry the Periphery name: the Singapore operating company registered in 2016 and a Hong Kong holding vehicle registered in 2018. They are distinct canonical entities, not aliases, and only the Singapore entity appears in the competitive record.

entity_card
P
Periphery Gaming Pte Ltd
ENT-O-0231 · organization · legal_entity
operating entity
SG · registered 2016
timeline

03Chronology

OccurredEventClaimRecorded
2019-06-30Registry records Dahlia Holdings as sole equity holder.CLM-10882026-10-12
2019-11-14Operating entity names a new management company under a services agreement.CLM-10892026-10-12
2021-03-02Trade publication quotes a former staff member on the control change.CLM-10912026-10-12
2021-08-09Exchange filing states no change of control occurred.CLM-10922026-10-13
para

Draft sentences in this section are unsupported until a claim block replaces them. Type /claim to link a canonical claim, or /research to commission evidence for this paragraph.

ED-P-014 · rev 3 · published 2026-10-20 sha256 4b71c0…
dossier · person & organizationas of 2026-10-23

Periphery Gaming: who actually controls the team

Equity, voting and operational control diverge after the 2019 restructuring — and the public record supports less than most coverage implies.

Periphery Gaming's public filings show a stable shareholder line and an unstable management arrangement. That gap is the story: the entity that owns the team and the entity that runs it have not been the same since late 2019.

01Key judgments

  1. Dahlia Holdings held 100% of the equity in Periphery Gaming as of 30 June 2019, and no filing contradicts that through 2021.

    high confidence● fact · supported2 sources · 1 root lineage
  2. Operational control most likely moved to a Dahlia management arm in late 2019, while economic ownership stayed with the founding shareholders.

    low confidence◇ assessment · disputedagreement not retrieved
  3. A 2021 press account of that transfer rests on an unattributed former staff member and is contradicted by an exchange filing; it is reported, not established.

    moderate confidence▲ reported · unverified2 contradictions on record

02Who is who

Periphery Gaming Pte Ltd is the Singapore operating company registered in 2016. The Hong Kong vehicle registered in 2018 holds the name but appears in no competitive or licensing record; it is a separate entity, not an alias.

03What happened, and when we learned it

The registry extract was retrieved in October 2026; the events it records date from 2019. Every entry distinguishes the date of the event from the date eDossier recorded it — a late filing is a fact about the filing, not about the event.

DossierED-P-014 · EIDS-01 v1
Revisionr3 · immutable snapshot · content hash 4b71c0…
Restrictionpublic · policy checklist complete 2026-10-20
Correctionsr2 corrected a mistranslated registry field; r1 unaffected and retained